This is my review of Arab Jazz by Karim Miske.

After the Charlie Hebdo massacre, Karim Miské was praised for his prescience in portraying the dysfunctional immigrant youth of the 19th arrondissement in Paris who are prey to the kind of fundamentalist extremism of those responsible for the attack. In a January 2015 interview in The Independent, Miské comes across as a thoughtful and insightful man, “Arab Jazz” has won prizes as a “literary” detective thriller, and perhaps it is meant to be a parody of a corrupt, greedy society with distorted values, but I was very disappointed by this novel.

Ahmed, an immigrant from North Africa, is addicted to violent thrillers as what seems like a counterproductive way of escaping from his traumatic past. As he sits reading on his balcony, drops of blood falling from above alert him to the brutal murder of his neighbour Laura who has shown him friendship. An air hostess who has severed links with her extremist Jehovah’s witness parents, Laura has been the subject of what looks like a ritual killing involving pork for which Ahmed fears he will be framed. The ensuing revelation of the facts is due not to the investigative powers of the two young detectives who although described as intellectuals display absolutely no evidence of this, but rather to the author’s tendency to indulge in lengthy, indigestible information dumps instead of making the effort to “show” us any development of plot, character or motive.

With its clunky, often implausible plot, two-dimensional characters, its crude stereotypes, relying far too much on psychotics, psychopathic policemen, and power-hungry, manipulative, hypocritical religious maniacs, its hammy violence alternating with corny sentimentality, and its amoral tastelessness and simplistic thinking without a trace of subtlety, “Arab Jazz” is like a garish strip cartoon. This impression is heightened by Miské’s habit of lapsing into capital letters at dramatic moments:

“LE CRIME

LEUR CRIME”

Or “DERNIER VOYAGE” for someone about to be bumped off.

I read to the end to improve my French – if this can be said of extending my vocabulary for sex, drugs and mild pornography – and to take part in a book group discussion, which could at least consider the book in the context of the current state of French urban society.

⭐⭐ 2 Stars

This is my review of Of Human Bondage by W. Somerset Maugham.

I believe there are quite a few parallels with Somerset Maugham’s own early life in this forensic study of a boy growing to become a man at the dawn of the last century: his hero Philip was orphaned young, brought up by a self-centred clergyman and his downtrodden sister, neither with much idea about children, bullied at school for his club foot, and grew up to be acutely observant, often using sarcasm to mask his hypersensitivity.

We see Philip moving from earnest piety to the conscious rejection of religion, with the startling sense of freedom this brings, trying out a variety of occupations, experimenting with romantic escapades but, to the reader’s frustration, continually falling under the influence of a woman who seems likely to destroy his future. Apart from providing a profound study of Philip’s thoughts and changing emotions, this is interesting for the details of daily life in late Victorian/Edwardian England: what things cost, how people trained for various qualifications, what they wore or ate and so on.

This reminds me of Michel Leon’s more recent “The Foundling Boy” (Le Jeune Homme Vert) published recently, but strikes a more serious and realistic note. Maugham should not be condemned for his narrator’s snobbish tone towards, say Cockney clerks or young women unaware of their lack of class as they fret over their respectability, since he must himself have been an inevitable product of the stuffy conventions in which he was raised. Yet, despite its often slow pace and dated attitudes, this classic stands the test of time and still deserves to be read for the wry humour, fluency and insight of the author’s warped genius.

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 5 Stars

This is my review of Disclaimer by Renée Knight.

How would you react if a book appeared in your possession, clearly based on a personal secret unknown to any living person which, if exposed, could ruin your professional career as an award-winning investigative television journalist and destroy your marriage? In this twisty page turner, the author skilfully reveals the facts, with a few red herrings, alternating chapters between the horrified Catherine, written in the third person, and the embittered author of the book who may himself be an unreliable narrator.

One of the most compelling aspects is the author’s ability to arouse sympathy at some point for all the main characters, even if one neither likes any of them, nor entirely trusts them. I also like the wry touches of humour, and the way she weaves in observations on a range of relationships: within marriage, between parents and only children, with an ageing mother slipping into dementia and in a variety of work situations, with a manipulative rival or a procedure-obsessed HR department.

My only reservation is that, although well-written and cleverly constructed, the book is occasionally just a little too much the product of a high-powered creative writing course – too contrived, pressing all the right buttons as regards say, just the right level of eroticism and drama, with a few twists too many at the end when the reader is already perfectly saturated with them.

⭐⭐⭐⭐ 4 Stars

This is my review of A Book of Scars: Breen & Tozer 3 (Breen and Tozer) by William Shaw.

It is advisable to have read the previous novels “A Song from Dead Lips” and “House of Knives” before embarking on “A Book of Scars”. Described as the third part of a trilogy, this will probably not be our last encounter with Detective Sergeant Cathal Breen, since the author continues his ploy of including a loose end or two in the final chapter.

The two main hooks in this novel are the unresolved murder case of Alexandra, younger sister of Breen’s sometime work colleague Helen Tozer, plus the question of whether Breen and Tozer will ever achieve a proper relationship. Since Helen is, perhaps understandably, capricious, foul-mouthed and given to drinking too much, the decent, conscientious Breen who has led a rather sad life seems to deserve someone a little more appealing.

What first drew me to this series is the portrayal of life in late 1960s London, which evokes a sense of shocked disbelief to recall a world that seems a little unreal in its casual sexism, racism and lack of any sense of “political correctness”. I am not sure William Shaw is old enough to have experienced this first-hand, but he does quite an effective reconstruction. There is a serious thread underlying his work, since he likes to use as a background major overseas events of the day, such as the Biafran War in the first novel and the aftermath of the Mau Mau rebellion in this one.

Perhaps the novelty has worn off, but I did not enjoy this book as much as the first one. I was continually madecaware that it is not very well written, with some staccato, disjointed passages as if it has been thrown together in a hurry to meet a publisher’s deadline. Many of the characters are stereotyped and two-dimensional. I know that people aged sooner in the ‘60s, but Helen’s parents seem too old for their years – unlikely to be more than in their fifties – and I grew tired of reading about “old man Tozer”. I would have liked more psychological development, such as Helen’s resentment when her father is ironically shaken out of his grief-induced lethargy because the girl Helen has brought to help out on the farm reminds him of Alexandra. Some of the most convincing scenes are at the police station, with the counterproductive rivalry between different teams, and laughable attempts to dress up as hippies for undercover work.

“A Book of Scars” strikes me as formulaic in the steady accumulation of evidence, largely through interviews, culminating in a scene of gruesome and arguably gratuitous violence. Not for the first time, Breen takes an implausibly rash action from which he seems unlikely to emerge unscathed, which at least creates some gritty tension to offset any final cosy conclusion.

⭐⭐⭐ 3 Stars

This is my review of Heart Of Darkness by Mr Joseph Conrad.

First published in 1899, Conrad’s celebrated novella “Heart of Darkness” uses the device of one tale book-ended within another. In this case, as sunset precedes the descent of darkness over the London Thames, Marlow begins to narrate to his colleagues on deck reminiscences of a visit to the snake-like river of central Africa, which has fascinated him since childhood. His task is to captain a steamboat on what is clearly the Congo. After repairing his damaged boat, he is sent to collect the mysterious ivory-trader Kurtz who is rumoured to be sick. The model for Coppola’s famous film “Apocalypse Now”, Kurtz proves an ambiguous figure. Is he criticised for having “lost his values” out of widespread envy for his commercial success? The natives seem to revere him as a kind of god, but there is evidence that he hates them.

At first, I took the book to be an indictment of the colonialism which exploited and degraded the Africans for imperial influence and commercial gain. Then I became uneasy at the evidence of stereotyping and a certain contempt for the natives. The story has a surreal, dreamlike quality, at one point the steamer is actually stranded in a heavy fog. Some descriptions are very striking, say of the bends in the river cut off from the rest of the world as the forests close in ahead and behind. Others passages seem disjointed and oddly phrased, reflecting the fact that English was Conrad’s third language so that, although remarkably expressive, words are not always used accurately.

I wondered at the time if the book is troubling for African readers, so was interested to find that it has been criticized in postcolonial studies, particularly by the highly regarded Nigerian novelist Chinua Achebe, who in his 1975 public lecture “An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness”, described Conrad’s novella as “an offensive and deplorable book” that dehumanised Africans. Achebe argued that Conrad, “blinkered…with xenophobia”, wrongly portrayed Africa as the opposite of Western civilisation, ignoring the artistic accomplishments of the Fang tribe who lived in the Congo River basin at the time of the book’s publication. Was Achebe being oversensitive, failing to appreciate Conrad’s own sense of horror at the brutality of westerners in Africa when he was employed on a Congo steamer, himself providing the model for Marlowe? I prefer to think there is irony in what may be misconstrued as racism on Conrad’s part.

Apart from the fact that I felt myself to have failed fully to understand the book on a first reading, the ending seems rather limp and disappointing. In short, the novella is remarkable for the quality of some of the writing, and for the debate it triggers, but may have been overrated.

⭐⭐⭐⭐ 4 Stars

This is my review of South Riding (Virago Modern Classics) by Winifred Holtby.

Feckless blacksmith's daughter made good, Sarah Burton returns as a headmistress to the coastal Yorkshire of her youth, resolved to inspire her girls to "Take what you want" and to "Question everything". It is a time of change, with the old social order of rural life breaking down and a growing division between town and country. The depression of the 1930s is combining with the aftermath of the First World War and hints of the rise of Hitler and Mussolini to destabilise the world in the next major conflict.

Sarah's progressive ideas and desire for modern, well-equipped school buildings are at odds with the values of the traditional, stubborn yet honourable and charismatic local landowner Robert Calne. Yet this proves to be much more than a sentimental romance or soap opera, rather the moving and in-depth portrayal of a community which Winifred Holtby understood partly through growing up as a Yorkshire farmer's daughter but also through her mother's accounts of working as the first woman councillor for the East Riding, embellished by her unwise habit of leaving council meeting minutes screwed up in her waste-paper bin. The resultant storyline of corruption and speculation over land deals, the achievement of the desirable "ends" of building decent council housing by questionable means, so alarmed Winifred's mother that she obstructed publication of "South Riding" until after her daughter's untimely death.

The author's knowledge of her own imminent death gives "South Riding" an edge. She does not flinch from "killing off" characters and revealing the hardship in a world that predates the NHS, social work safety net and compulsory secondary education for girls under sixteen. Yet the book is saved from mawkish sorrow by the lively dialogues, striking descriptions, wry humour and realism of the narrative, with wonderful anecdotes from some of the characters.

At over five hundred pages, it may seem rather long, but the plus side is that the reader can become immersed in the characters' lives. This deserves to be called a "classic" with its hints of Thomas Hardy's Wessex, "Under Milkwood", George Eliot's "Middlemarch" and Arnold Bennett's "Five Towns", with the drama switched to the East Yorkshire wolds, crumbling cliffs, dramatic sunsets and constant presence of the sea. The story is all the more powerful and authentic for having been written during the period to which it relates. Winifred Holtby shows great prescience in sensing "the way things were going" and some issues, such as recession, the venality and self-interest of politicians, the uncertainty of life and the "sturdy endurance in obscurity" of ordinary people still resonate today.

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 5 Stars